| 
  | 
  |  Ein sehr seltener Protofaustkeil (Chopping Tool) eines Frühmenschen der Art Homo heidelbergensis aus dem archaischen Acheuleén  |  
  | 
  |  Epoche: Günz-, Mindelkomplex, Protoacheuleen  Fundort: Terrasse de Llabanere, Pres Rivesaltes, Roussillion,Pyrenees-Orientales
   |  
  | .jpeg) 
 
 .jpeg) 
 
 .jpeg) 
  Größe: 98 x 68 x 43 mm  Alter: ca. 0,7- 0,5 Millionen Jahre
  Ein beeindruckendes Werkzeug der ersten Europäer - des Homo heidelbergensis. Originalfundstück! / Unique item!
  Pebble Tool from the Terrasses of the Roussill:  A Polyhedron was found at the Pleistocene  Terrasse de Llabanere near Rivesaltes in Southern France (Pyrénées  Orientales).     They come from a larger collection consisting mainly of quartzite and  quartz tools, which at first glance look very "archaic" and of course  some researchers wanted to describe such ensembles as "Preacheulian" and  suggested that they were produced during the Lower/Middle-Pleistocene  boundary by the earliest hominides entering South Europe.    
  Anyhow, convincingly, the terasse of Llabanere was formed during the  Middle Pleistocene, and therefore the many artifact concentrations of  the terasse may not be as old as initially suggested (Giret 2014).  Paleolithic findings from river terasses are notoriously difficult to  date. These terasses can only be used as a terminus ante quem.  Anyhow,  excavated and dated nearby Archaeological sites show (often ambiguous)  analogies for an age determination of surface collections. Fortunately the nearby Caune de l’Arago can help us to get an idea about  the dating of such artifacts, which were in abundance found at other  river terrases in the Roussillon (Terrasse de Cabestany, Terrasse de la  Butte du Four, Terasse de Mas Ferreol...). The Caune de l’Arago is a large cave site (35 m long and 10 m wide) at  Tautavel in southern France, near the town of Perpignan and has been  systematically excavated for more than 40 years now and is a model for  defining some characteristics of Middle Pleistocene cave habitats in  Southern Europe. The significance of the Cave has been known since 1828,  when the famous paleontologist Marcel de Serres found animal bones, and  classified them as “antediluvian”.       Figure 3   In 1963, following the discovery of prehistoric tools by Jean Abelanet,  Henry de Lumley decided to begin excavations at the Arago Cave.  Important climatic fluctuations have been recorded within the cave’s  thick stratigraphical sequence, which covers a period from MIS 14  through 5, beginning with a basal stalagmitic floor (700 k.a.).    The infill of the cave, most of which is correlated to MIS 14, 13 and  12, has yielded numerous distinct occupation floors, exceptionally rich  stone implements and animal fossils, while some of the levels have also  yielded hominin remains attributed to Homo Heidelbergensis. The  environment changed over such a long time.    We observe humans in harsh climatic conditions and a steppe like  environment, populated with reindeer, musk ox and even arctic fox but  also warmer and moister condition characterized by fallow or red deer.    Large herbivore carcasses were brought into the cave by humans and their  bones often show traces of human intervention such as cut marks and  systematic breakage whose interpretation reveals the characteristics and  evolution of hunting and butchering techniques over time. Archeologists  have tracked several different modes of using the cave by early humans:     "The the long duration habitat, where the cave was used as a home base;  the temporary seasonal habitat, in which case the cave served as a  secondary campsite; the hunting stopover, during which the cave was used  as a refuge for short term stays. Behavioral patterns appear to be  directly related to the type of habitat and oriented towards a principal  activity: hunting. Each of these modes is correlated with different  modes of land use, procurement of raw materials and lithic production"  (Barski et al.).    Silex, quartz and quartzite, coming mainly from nearby procurement areas  (5-20 km), were simultaneously used as raw materials. Traces of fire  have been found only in the upper part of the sequence at Arago, in  archaeological layers that are younger than 350 k.a. No charcoal, no  burnt bones, nor any other evidence of fire have been reported from any  of the assemblages from the lower levels (dated to MIS 14-12).    Deborah Barsky recently drew attention to the relationship of raw materials and tool types:    "the largest supports were systematically chosen for the shaping  of retouched tools. This may be explained by the overall scraper  dominance in the toolkits and by a preference for long retouched cutting  edgesthe initial knapping stages for most rock types occurred outside  ofthe cave, regardless of the distance from which the raw material was  collected. Exception is made for limestone, a material reserved for  pebble-tool manufacture which does appear to have taken place inside the  cave vein quartz was the preferred raw material among all technological  and typological groups, in spite of the availability of other kinds of  rocks nearby. The only exceptions are pebble-tools, made mostly from  limestone, and handaxes, made mostly from hornfels.more complex and longer knapping sequences (globular, multiplatform  or discoidal core types) were executed on best quality raw materials  (flint, quartzite, translucent quartz)"    Recently, excavations have reached the so-called ‘‘P’’ levels,  attributed to a series of occupation floors accumulated during  short-term stays by hominin groups during a cold, dry phase of MIS 14.  It is interesting to consider the precise handiwork and care with which  raw materials were selected for the confection of the fine quality  instruments typical of the ‘‘P’’ levels” assemblages, whose "Acheulian"  character is underlined by a relative abundance of symmetrical and  remarkably well-worked handaxes.    "Choppers", "Chopping tools", polyhedrons and flake tools (Tayac Points,  Quinson Points, Denticulations, Scrapers, some "Protolimaces") ,  produced by a non-Levallois technique (“Clacton” , opportunistic and  discoidal) were present during most of the Middle Pleistocene layers.    It was not before the Levels G-D (440-400 k.a.), that a technique which  could be called “Protolevallois” began to arise. A poor Mousterian was  present during OIS7-5 with incontestable Levallois connotation.  Handaxes, although in small numbers (1-5%), were found during most of  the Middle Pleistocene deposits.    The Mode-2 sequence and the gradual evolution of an early Middle  Paleolithic at Arago has some counterparts in S-Europe: In France, the  industries from the Middle Loire Basin , the lower levels (H, I and K)  of Aldène Cave, la Baume Bonne at Quinson and Orgnac 3 show similarities  in their structural development to the Caune de l’Arago.    In Spain, The Atapuerca Middle Pleistocene sites of Galleria and Gran  Dolina show a similar evolutionary trend in sites ranging from around  500-300 k.a. If we look for analogies of our artifacts with those of  Arago, the Llabanere material may be dated to a wide Middle Pleistocene  time frame of 500-300 k.a.
  (article ID 1696 from our Aggsbachs Paleolithic Blog)
  Weiterführende Informationen zu diesen und weiteren Fundstücken finden Sie in verschiedenen Artikel auf Aggsbachs Paleolithic Blog.
  Nochmals eine Anmerkung zur Echtheit aller meiner angebotenen Artefakte: Es kann für jedes Stück, zu jeder Zeit, eine Expertise eines staatlich anerkannten Gutachters oder eines internen Fachexperten beigebracht werden. Der Preis hierfür beträgt 40 Euro (externe Expertise) / 20 Euro (interne Expertise) und muss vom Käufer in Auftrag gegeben werden.
  Information zum Thema "Schutz von Kulturgütern": Der Handel mit den von mir angebotenen Artefakten ist erlaubt. Sie stammen alle ausnahmslos aus Altsammlungen die mehr als 30 Jahre und älter waren und/oder wissenschaftlich gesichtet und freigegeben wurden.
  Explizit gilt das auch für die Funde aus den deutschen Bundesländern, sowie ausländischen Ländern, in denen der Verkauf und die Ausfuhr auch heute noch erlaubt ist.
  Somit ist der Besitz der von mir erworbenen Artefakte legal und entspricht den gesetzlichen Bestimmungen.
  Besuchen Sie bitte auch meine anderen Auktionen!
 
  Besuchen Sie bitte auch meinen Ebay-shop Terra-Paleontologica!   
  Petrefakt trifft Artefakt - Schaustücke & Systematik Riesenauswahl und Top-Qualität Einzigartige Fundstücke aus allen Epochen des ErdzeitaltersVersandkostenregelung: Angegebene Versandkosten + 0,90 Euro Umverpackung pro weiterem Artikel.  |  
  | 
  |  
  | Um zu garantieren, dass Ihre Fossilien und Artefakte sicher bei Ihnen ankommen, werden unsere Sendungen stets versichertverschickt.  | 
  |  
  |  
  | 
  |